Part 1 of the Action Front Collective (anti)Manifesto
We are entering a new climate of Total Revolution. That is, either we pursue Total Revolution or we fail. There is no such thing as a partial revolution or a gradual revolution or a revolution in “stages.”
Firstly, we must dispel some common myths(To long-time pro-revolutionary comrades, excuse us a we go over some basics):
- Under the present system of Total Capitalism, i.e Real Subsumption. Does any pro-revolutionary truly believe we can win through the electorate? That the system will allow anything remotely dangerous or threatening to gain power through a election. that they’d just shake our hands and hand over the keys to the house without dirty tricks? Without a fight?
- Will any organization which owns property, P.O boxes, collects dues, has a bank account and publicly listed “officers” and utilizes “democracy” to organize it’s affairs be able to carry out a revolution given point #1? Would the system allow a truly revolutionary organization to simple utilize it’s postal system, it’s property regime, it’s banks and public squares and meeting areas to threaten itself?
Real Subsumption renders this impossible. Under Formal Subsumption, when pre-capitalist forces still controlled much of society and prevented Capital from organizing society itself for it’s own interests, yes, this was possible, but not now. Formal Subsumption was a holding pattern between pre-capitalist forms of domination and capitalist. In that moment, nearly anything was possible. Considering the vulnerability any revolutionary organization has if it operates according to point #2 what would one expect if they were to “seize” power through an election like outlined in point #1? All the aspects which were a strength in regards to winning elections now become weaknesses once the election has been won! That is, if the state can’t undermine it beforehand.
Unfortunately, most pro-revolutionaries outside and inside the ultra-left and anarchist movement still go by the old playbooks. We seek to synthesize a New Playbook, by accepting the consequences of Real Subsumption and adjust accordingly. This is the principle of Ruthless Practicality combined with Ruthless Application of Principle.
What principles shall pro-revolutionaries ruthlessly pursue?
- Analysis to understand the present context
- Militancy and resources to apply analysis to Action(praxis)
- resilience to continuously act despite all obstacles
Considering the reality of Real Subsumption/Real Domination. Considering the principles needed for any revolutionary movement to sustain itself and to succeed, what way forward? What is to be done?
Communization has shown us what we cannot do in terms of the social revolution itself. That is, how the proletariat shall reorganize(or not) a new (anti)economy. What pitfalls the workers movement(R.I.P.) succumbed to and how old revolutionary roads led to new counter-revolutionary dead-ends. Yet a truly communist analysis must take into account the past, it must sublimate and synthesize.
Our contention is that, if the historical workers’ movement is today alien to us, it is because the form of the capital–labour relation that sustained the workers’ movement no longer obtains: in the high-income countries since the 1970s and in the low-income countries since the 1980s (late workers’ movements appeared in South Africa, South Korea and Brazil, but all now present the same form: social democracy in retreat). Indeed, the social foundations on which the workers’ movement was built have been torn out: the factory system no longer appears as the kernel of a new society in formation; the industrial workers who labour there no longer appear as the vanguard of a class in the process of becoming revolutionary. All that remains of this past-world are certain logics of disintegration, and not only of the workers’ movement, but also of the capital–labour relation itself. To say so is not to suggest that, by some metric, all workers are “really” unemployed, or to deny that there is an emergent industrial proletariat in countries like India and China.
-Endotes #4, a History of Separation
The aims of anarchists and true communists are identical.- Johann Most
If they old workers movement was disciplined and organized in the way that worker’s were by the factory- that is, by an external force- and if this system has broken down, then it follows we can not continue as if it were operational. If order and discipline cannot, and is not, being enforced from without, by the factories, by the foreman’s and by the bosses on one end of the pole and by the union steward’s, the organizers, the communist parties on the other end, then how is society- capitalist society which produces its own gravediggers- reshaping the revolutionary subject now, under the present conditions? in the present context, in the present tense we must assume a looser and more flexible (anti?)organization and at once, a stricter discipline of ourselves as theorists and as actors.
Is it any wonder that anarchism was more present and popular in the beginnings of capitalist development only to give way to social democracy and communism as the factory system truly took hold? Compare Spain and Italy in the early 20th century to Germany and the United Kingdom at the time.
But we today are not devolving into a pre-capitalist situation! Even though the factory system has fallen apart, we haven’t devolved- we have revolved. We have cycled out of the old workers’ movement into something similar and yet at once different. Echoes of the past and glimpses of the future. In this present time of crisis and acceleration, a new synthesis of the elements of anarchism, past and present, and Marxism, past and present(even including elements of Leninism!) is required. Our new discipline will be internally imposed at the individual level rather than externally by a party as our lives are no longer disciplined by the factory floor but by internalized ideology, by spectacle- capitalist ideology.
One awaits the revolution in vain, for it is already underway. It is unnoticed by those who await it, expecting a particular sign, a ‘crisis’ releasing the vast insurrectional movement which would produce another essential sign, the formation of the party etc… Actually the disequilibrium began before May 1968 and May was its externalization, so on all levels of the total life process of capital, there are also the ‘misfirings’ which have not yet been transformed into crises in the old sense, but which allow the proletarians to destroy their domestication. The increasing loss of our real submission to capital will allow us to confront the true question of the revolution, not that of changing life, because all life has been enslaved, domesticated, misled by the existence of classes for millenia, but the creation of human life. – Camatte
Capital, in the state such as it is, destroying the planet and slowly killing itself in the process is only continuing because it has succeeded in pacifying the proletariat. Domesticating it. While in the past, the proletariat maintained its old ways and it’s own ideology and so on, and had to be domesticated by external force, by the factory clock, today this situation has been reversed. The proletariat has no mind of it’s own and yet, more personal freedom than ever- although, granted, in the double sense Marx observed.
The proletariat cannot itself come to power except by becoming the class of consciousness. The growth of productive forces cannot guarantee such power, even by way of the increasing dispossession which it brings about. A Jacobin seizure of power cannot be its instrument. No ideology can help the proletariat disguise its partial goals as general goals, because the proletariat cannot preserve any partial reality which is really its own. – Camatte
To this end, Action Front! is proposing a new strategy- we act out a new strategy! A new “Playbook”is being written by action and analysis combined. We call this new philosophy: ‘Actionism.’
Part 2: Counter-Spectacle
……
Check back later for part 2!